Re: A Comparison: Triads & TRIZ: Three Objects Comprise a Phenomenon
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post a followup ] [ Systematic Creativity ] [ FAQ ]
Submitted by Frenklach Gregory at Maj 18, 1998 klockan 18:16:09:
Reply to: Re: A Comparison: Triads & TRIZ: Three Objects Comprise a Phenomenon submitted by James Kowalick at Maj 18, 1998 klockan 02:29:27:
Thank You. Everything is clear enough with triads' approach to
problem solving. Let's resume: 1. You formulate the system function (or function to be improved);
2, Then You look for "enabling object" using triad's approach
("active" and "passive" objects You take from the function's
formulation). Actually You build triad for the function.
3. Then You analyze interactions between the objects of the triad
and for every interaction You or:
a. build it's Su-Field and then look for solution(s) using Su-Field
analysis and standards;
b. determine the conflict zones and then look for solution(s) using,
for example, physical contradiction removal principles;
c. may be you use other TRIZ tools or approaches; Conclusion:
In problem solving process You use triads as description language
on the problem statement stage. This enables You to "discover" and
analyze (if You use for example Su-Fields) three Su-Fields instead of
one Su-Field (in comparison with "usual" using of Su-Fields). Well, we use TRIZ tools together with other non-TRIZ approaches
- so why not to use them together with triad's approach?
It seems to be useful.
Followup:
Post a followup
|